public inbox for linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* Chip mapping AM29LV320D
@ 2005-01-07  9:28 Komal Shah
  2005-01-07 12:31 ` David Woodhouse
  2005-01-10 14:52 ` Komal Shah
  0 siblings, 2 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Komal Shah @ 2005-01-07  9:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-mtd

Hi,

As per the google search I have found the following
thread:

http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-mtd/2002-October/006185.html

We are going to use the same chip on our custom board.
As per the thread, I understood that we need to write
"chip mapping driver" taking as example from physmap.c
- with specifying related information of this chip. 

But, if anyone had developed the same mapping driver
then they can share it with me.

Let me know if anyone need more information.

--Komal Shah

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
http://mail.yahoo.com 

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* Re: Chip mapping AM29LV320D
  2005-01-07  9:28 Chip mapping AM29LV320D Komal Shah
@ 2005-01-07 12:31 ` David Woodhouse
  2005-01-10 14:52 ` Komal Shah
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: David Woodhouse @ 2005-01-07 12:31 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Komal Shah; +Cc: linux-mtd

On Fri, 2005-01-07 at 01:28 -0800, Komal Shah wrote:
> 
> We are going to use the same chip on our custom board.
> As per the thread, I understood that we need to write
> "chip mapping driver" taking as example from physmap.c
> - with specifying related information of this chip. 
> 
> But, if anyone had developed the same mapping driver
> then they can share it with me.

But your board is a _custom_ board. How could anyone have written the
same mapping driver already? Nobody has a board the same as yours.

The mapping driver just sets things up correctly for access to the flash
chips, depending on the physical address and size etc. That's all
specific to _your_ board.

I think the AM29LV320D is CFI-compliant so you don't _need_ specific
support for it. It should just work with cfi_probe.

-- 
dwmw2

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* Re: Chip mapping AM29LV320D
  2005-01-07  9:28 Chip mapping AM29LV320D Komal Shah
  2005-01-07 12:31 ` David Woodhouse
@ 2005-01-10 14:52 ` Komal Shah
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Komal Shah @ 2005-01-10 14:52 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-mtd

David,

> 
> But your board is a _custom_ board. How could anyone
> have written the
> same mapping driver already? Nobody has a board the
> same as yours.

Correct. We are going to have few boards only for demo
purpose.

> 
> The mapping driver just sets things up correctly for
> access to the flash
> chips, depending on the physical address and size
> etc. That's all
> specific to _your_ board.

Yes. I looked at few mapping drivers and understood
them.

> 
> I think the AM29LV320D is CFI-compliant so you don't
> _need_ specific
> support for it. It should just work with cfi_probe.
> 

Yes. AM29LV320D is CFI-compliant. 

Thanx for the reply.

---Komal Shah


		
__________________________________ 
Do you Yahoo!? 
The all-new My Yahoo! - What will yours do?
http://my.yahoo.com 

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2005-01-10 14:52 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2005-01-07  9:28 Chip mapping AM29LV320D Komal Shah
2005-01-07 12:31 ` David Woodhouse
2005-01-10 14:52 ` Komal Shah

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox