From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from 206.173.66.57.ptr.us.xo.net ([206.173.66.57] helo=zebra.brightstareng.com) by canuck.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43 #1 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1DOFRP-0008By-Od for linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org; Wed, 20 Apr 2005 09:40:32 -0400 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by zebra.brightstareng.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8BC2528C2A0 for ; Wed, 20 Apr 2005 09:40:32 -0400 (EDT) Received: from zebra.brightstareng.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (zebra [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 09731-02 for ; Wed, 20 Apr 2005 09:40:30 -0400 (EDT) Received: from pippin (unknown [192.168.1.25]) by zebra.brightstareng.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E576C28C1E2 for ; Wed, 20 Apr 2005 09:40:30 -0400 (EDT) From: Ian McDonnell To: linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org Date: Wed, 20 Apr 2005 09:40:30 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200504200940.30757.ian@brightstareng.com> Subject: Suggestion: Give JFFS its own mail list. List-Id: Linux MTD discussion mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Is it time to give JFFS/JFFS2 a mail list of its own? I am a user intested in MTD and below but not jffs, and it seams like there's a lot of jffs adn jffs/mtd discussion on the MTD list. Decoupling the two mail lists may indirectly help improve the MTD/mtd-clent (JFFS2,YAFFS,Char-IO/Block-IO) API by focusing more on the abstract interface and less on application specifics. -ian