From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from atlantis.8hz.com ([212.129.237.78]) by canuck.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43 #1 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1DhmoQ-0005tk-Rs for linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org; Mon, 13 Jun 2005 07:09:03 -0400 Received: from atlantis.8hz.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by atlantis.8hz.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A6CB1BBB2 for ; Mon, 13 Jun 2005 13:09:01 +0200 (CEST) Received: (from sean@localhost) by atlantis.8hz.com (8.13.1/8.13.1/Submit) id j5DB91Xp025718 for linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org; Mon, 13 Jun 2005 13:09:01 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from sean) Date: Mon, 13 Jun 2005 13:09:01 +0200 From: Sean Young To: linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org Message-ID: <20050613110901.GA24649@atlantis.8hz.com> References: <20050613104818.GB24387@atlantis.8hz.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20050613104818.GB24387@atlantis.8hz.com> Subject: Re: inftl major number List-Id: Linux MTD discussion mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Mon, Jun 13, 2005 at 12:48:18PM +0200, Sean Young wrote: > According to Documentation/devices.txt and > http://www.lanana.org/docs/device-list/devices-2.6+.txt the major number > of the inftl is 96; however the driver uses 94. 94 is already in use by > another driver (IBM S/390 DASD block storage). Can this by applied? Here is part of the original thread: http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-mtd/2004-September/010460.html And http://www.ussg.iu.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/0409.2/1220.html AFAICS the change never made its way into mtd. Sean