From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from [81.3.11.18] (helo=mail.ku-gbr.de) by canuck.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.43 #1 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1DqB9x-0002eu-Pj for linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org; Wed, 06 Jul 2005 10:46:01 -0400 Received: from dsl-082-082-157-117.arcor-ip.net ([82.82.157.117]:2480 helo=zappa) by mail.ku-gbr.de with esmtpa (Exim 4.50 #1 (Debian)) id 1DqBDK-0001OC-OM for ; Wed, 06 Jul 2005 16:49:27 +0200 Received: from konsti by zappa with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 1DqB9l-0003JY-00 for ; Wed, 06 Jul 2005 16:45:45 +0200 Date: Wed, 6 Jul 2005 16:45:45 +0200 From: Konstantin Kletschke To: linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org Message-ID: <20050706144545.GA11447@zappa> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Subject: xip changes between 2.6.11 and 20050530? List-Id: Linux MTD discussion mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Hello to the list members! I had XIP in linux-2.6.11 running very well. Then I patched a mtd snapshot from 20050530 in in order to get code into there which properly unlock intel K3 flash devices properly (which is not solved yet). Now the xipuImage freezes at booting when it comes to Probing scb9328_flash at physical address 0x10000000 (16-bit buswidth) Are there any changes between the both versions which I should be aware of? The xip.h looks still reasonable though, I don't get it. What I doscovered is the NO_XIP define which was introduced into some mapping drivers, should I take care of that and put it into mine also? I did not found out yet, what it does really... regards, Konsti