From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from [81.3.11.18] (helo=mail.ku-gbr.de) by canuck.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.52 #1 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1Dy7Ki-0007oG-Ml for linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 08:18:00 -0400 Received: from dsl-082-082-158-021.arcor-ip.net ([82.82.158.21]:40881 helo=zappa) by mail.ku-gbr.de with esmtpa (Exim 4.50 #1 (Debian)) id 1Dy7NZ-0005ZX-RA for ; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 14:20:49 +0200 Received: from konsti by zappa with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 1Dy7Kd-0007OA-00 for ; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 14:17:47 +0200 Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2005 14:17:47 +0200 From: Konstantin Kletschke To: linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org Message-ID: <20050728121746.GA28368@zappa> References: <20050706144545.GA11447@zappa> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20050706144545.GA11447@zappa> Subject: Re: xip changes between 2.6.11 and 20050530? List-Id: Linux MTD discussion mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , * Konstantin Kletschke [Wed, Jul 06, 2005 at 04:45:45PM +0200]: > I had XIP in linux-2.6.11 running very well. Meanwhile I found out a solution. I switched off CONFIG_FPE_NWFPE=y which the XIP System seems to depend on! K