From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from [81.3.11.18] (helo=mail.ku-gbr.de) by canuck.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.52 #1 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1DyCnP-0002RZ-HN for linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 14:07:55 -0400 Received: from dsl-082-082-158-021.arcor-ip.net ([82.82.158.21]:48043 helo=zappa) by mail.ku-gbr.de with esmtpa (Exim 4.50 #1 (Debian)) id 1DyCqL-0001iy-9V for ; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 20:10:54 +0200 Received: from konsti by zappa with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 1DyCn6-00022g-00 for ; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 20:07:32 +0200 Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2005 20:07:32 +0200 From: Konstantin Kletschke To: linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org Message-ID: <20050728180732.GA7840@zappa> References: <20050706144545.GA11447@zappa> <20050728121746.GA28368@zappa> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Subject: Re: xip changes between 2.6.11 and 20050530? List-Id: Linux MTD discussion mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , * Nicolas Pitre [Thu, Jul 28, 2005 at 11:01:24AM -0400]: > > I switched off CONFIG_FPE_NWFPE=y which the XIP System seems to depend > > on! > > It sure doesn't. > > Something else must be going on. Hm.. funny. Beside the trouble with my toolchains the working one creates definately only a bootable xipuImage if CONFIG_FPE_NWFPE is enabled. I wonder myself, why... I rechecked again now. Konsti