Re: JFFS2 eraseblock header

Jörn Engel
2005-09-09T22:21:12Z

On Fri, 9 September 2005 17:08:28 +0400, Artem B. Bityuckiy wrote:
> Josh Boyer wrote:
> >
> >In any case, would you please bump the overall version of JFFS2 if this
> >change is made? I don't mean "JFFS3", I mean "JFFS2 version 2.3" or
> >similar. See super.c line 320 for where I'm talking about.
> Agree, this should be done. I also offered to introduce a version number
> byte to the erasebloch header. This is somewhat ugly but will help to
> quickly recognize the JFFS2 image version. In future this will help us.

All right, you win. Can you bump the version to 2.3?

Jörn

--
tglx1 thinks that joern should get a (TM) for "Thinking Is Hard"
-- Thomas Gleixner