Re: JFFS2 eraseblock header

Artem B. Bityuckiy
2005-09-08T13:58:07Z

David Woodhouse wrote:
> Should it? I wonder if it should silently upgrade, instead? Or at least
> have a mount option to make it upgrade? We want to leave the old format
> behind...
That would be spiffy to leave it behind and save a lot efforts.
But in this case new JFFS2 binaries will reject mounting old JFFS2 images.
If this is accaptable - fine. Personally I don't care, but people may.
:-)

--
Best Regards,
Artem B. Bityuckiy,
St.-Petersburg, Russia.