From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from desire.actrix.co.nz ([203.96.16.164]) by canuck.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.52 #1 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1EHvTA-00044C-UP for linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org; Tue, 20 Sep 2005 23:40:39 -0400 From: Charles Manning To: David Woodhouse Date: Wed, 21 Sep 2005 15:45:32 +1200 References: <200509201332.31431.manningc2@actrix.gen.nz> <1127209144.9750.47.camel@baythorne.infradead.org> In-Reply-To: <1127209144.9750.47.camel@baythorne.infradead.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200509211545.32443.manningc2@actrix.gen.nz> Cc: linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org Subject: Re: FAT on raw Nand -->PTP List-Id: Linux MTD discussion mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Tuesday 20 September 2005 21:39, David Woodhouse wrote: > On Tue, 2005-09-20 at 13:32 +1200, Charles Manning wrote: > > Unfortunately there is no USB-NFS. There is only a USB mass storage > > device which can be used with most block file systems (typically FAT). > > USB-NFS would have been a good idea because it would allow devices to u= se > > their own FS internally. > > The 'USB-NFS' of which you speak is called 'PTP', and it's used by many > cameras. =46rom a quick read of the USB PTP spec, it would seem that PTP is rather=20 picture centric. Is that the case or can PTP also be used for more general= =20 data?