From: Adrian Bunk <bunk@stusta.de>
To: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>,
linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [2.6 patch] no longer mark MTD_OBSOLETE_CHIPS as BROKEN and remove broken MTD_OBSOLETE_CHIPS drivers
Date: Sun, 8 Jan 2006 01:24:57 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20060108002457.GE3774@stusta.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1136678409.30348.26.camel@pmac.infradead.org>
On Sun, Jan 08, 2006 at 12:00:09AM +0000, David Woodhouse wrote:
> On Sat, 2006-01-07 at 23:07 +0100, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> > This patch brings the MTD_SHARP driver back into life and removes the
> > non-compiling MTD_AMDSTD and MTD_JEDEC with everything depending on
> > them.
>
> Please provide further background on your reasoning. I'll enumerate my
> questions to make it easy for you to answer each one fully.
>
> 1. Precisely when were these chip drivers marked obsolete?
Since kernel 2.4.11-pre4, released Thu, 4 Oct 2001 20:47:23 -0700.
> 2. What was the reason for marking them obsolete?
The changelog says:
- David Woodhouse: large MTD and JFFS[2] update
> 3. What are the factors which led you to conclude that _now_ is the time
> to actually remove them?
http://lkml.org/lkml/2005/12/12/43
> 4. What are the factors which led you to _remove_ the map drivers which
> currently use the obsolete chip drivers, rather than taking the obvious
> alternative solution for those map drivers?
It seems that for one and a half years noone considered it a problem
that they were no longer available...
> dwmw2
cu
Adrian
--
"Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out
of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days.
"Only a promise," Lao Er said.
Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-01-08 0:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-01-07 22:07 [2.6 patch] no longer mark MTD_OBSOLETE_CHIPS as BROKEN and remove broken MTD_OBSOLETE_CHIPS drivers Adrian Bunk
2006-01-08 0:00 ` David Woodhouse
2006-01-08 0:24 ` Adrian Bunk [this message]
2006-01-08 0:38 ` David Woodhouse
2006-01-08 1:45 ` Andrew Morton
2006-01-08 12:41 ` David Woodhouse
2006-01-08 12:57 ` Adrian Bunk
2006-01-08 13:06 ` David Woodhouse
2006-01-08 14:14 ` [2.6 patch] no longer mark MTD_OBSOLETE_CHIPS as BROKEN Adrian Bunk
2006-01-08 14:24 ` David Woodhouse
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2006-01-06 18:14 [2.6 patch] no longer mark MTD_OBSOLETE_CHIPS as BROKEN and remove broken MTD_OBSOLETE_CHIPS drivers Adrian Bunk
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20060108002457.GE3774@stusta.de \
--to=bunk@stusta.de \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=dwmw2@infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox