From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailout.stusta.mhn.de ([141.84.69.5]) by canuck.infradead.org with smtp (Exim 4.54 #1 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1Eva6X-0002oE-Ez for linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org; Sun, 08 Jan 2006 07:57:09 -0500 Date: Sun, 8 Jan 2006 13:57:00 +0100 From: Adrian Bunk To: David Woodhouse Message-ID: <20060108125700.GI3774@stusta.de> References: <20060107220702.GZ3774@stusta.de> <1136678409.30348.26.camel@pmac.infradead.org> <20060108002457.GE3774@stusta.de> <1136680734.30348.34.camel@pmac.infradead.org> <20060107174523.460f1849.akpm@osdl.org> <1136724072.30348.66.camel@pmac.infradead.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1136724072.30348.66.camel@pmac.infradead.org> Cc: Andrew Morton , linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [2.6 patch] no longer mark MTD_OBSOLETE_CHIPS as BROKEN and remove broken MTD_OBSOLETE_CHIPS drivers List-Id: Linux MTD discussion mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Sun, Jan 08, 2006 at 12:41:12PM +0000, David Woodhouse wrote: > On Sat, 2006-01-07 at 17:45 -0800, Andrew Morton wrote: > > Hey, Adrian isn't an MTD developer > > Indeed he is not. And while his minor nitpicks can sometimes be worth > the effort, it's less useful for him to start making value judgements > about removing drivers which have _theoretically_ been replaced by new > code, but which are actually still being used in some cases. I interpreted your "or just removed" in [1] as your approval for a patch to remove the non-compiling drivers. I'm not a native English speaker, and therefore I might have misunderstood your email. What I want for 2.6.16 is to remove the wrong dependency of MTD_SHARP on BROKEN and the non-compiling drivers either still hidden under BROKEN or removed. If there is any way I can submit a patch achieving this that would be acceptable for you simply tell how exactly you want this patch. > > What he's doing here is to poke other maintainers into getting the tree > > cleaned up. It's a useful thing to do. > > I know what needs doing to clean the tree up -- and removing the older > chip drivers is very far from the top of my todo list. If you really > want to accelerate their demise, add a #warning and a printk saying "You > should no longer be using this driver -- try using jedec_probe or > cfi_probe instead and contact the linux-mtd list if that fails". >... We are talking about drivers marked as BROKEN for one and a half years that do no longer compile. > dwmw2 cu Adrian [1] http://lkml.org/lkml/2005/12/12/43 -- "Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days. "Only a promise," Lao Er said. Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed