From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail.shareable.org ([81.29.64.88]) by canuck.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.54 #1 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1FBi1z-0008V6-8A for linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org; Tue, 21 Feb 2006 19:39:04 -0500 Date: Wed, 22 Feb 2006 00:38:44 +0000 From: Jamie Lokier To: Charles Manning Message-ID: <20060222003844.GA31305@mail.shareable.org> References: <43EB96DC.3030900@eptar.com> <200602211140.30069.manningc2@actrix.gen.nz> <1140477524.2480.827.camel@localhost.localdomain> <200602211408.05208.manningc2@actrix.gen.nz> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200602211408.05208.manningc2@actrix.gen.nz> Cc: tglx@linutronix.de, linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org, yaffs@stoneboat.aleph1.co.uk Subject: Re: [Yaffs] bit error rates --> YAFFS for devices with no OOB List-Id: Linux MTD discussion mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Charles Manning wrote: > OK, I'll start investigating an OOB-less YAFFS and give that a priority > depending on the amount of interest. Hint to everyone: If this sounds > interesting, respond (on or off list), especially if you'd like to be > involved in some way. Would that make it more usable as a filesystem for Compact Flash cards? I've heard of people using JFFS2 on Compact Flash (using blkmtd), because it's power-fail-safe and is much better for wear than, say, ext3. -- Jamie