public inbox for linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jonathan McDowell <noodles@earth.li>
To: Ben Dooks <ben-mtd@fluff.org>
Cc: linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Make nand block functions use provided byte/word helpers.
Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2006 22:25:59 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20060228222559.GC14749@earth.li> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20060228221243.GC25880@home.fluff.org>

On Tue, Feb 28, 2006 at 10:12:43PM +0000, Ben Dooks wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 28, 2006 at 08:59:03PM +0000, Jonathan McDowell wrote:
> > I've been writing a NAND driver for the flash on the Amstrad E3. One of
> > the peculiarities of this device is that the write & read enable lines
> > are on a latch, rather than strobed by the act of reading/writing from
> > the data latch. As such I've got custom read_byte/write_byte functions
> > defined. However the nand_*_buf functions in drivers/mtd/nand/nand_base.c
> > are all appropriate, except for the fact they call readb/writeb
> > themselves, instead of using this->read_byte or this->write_byte. The
> > patch below changes them to use these functions, meaning a driver just
> > needs to define read_byte and write_byte functions and gains all the
> > nand_*_buf functions free.
> 
> Why not make life easier on everyone else by over-riding the
> functions for read/write buffer (etc) in the nand driver... less
> intrusive into the core code!

If the patch is deemed too intrusive then that's what I'll do; I nearly
did so originally but when I caught myself cut and pasting the code from
nand_base I thought my patch was the cleaner way.

The patch shouldn't cause any extra work for anyone that I can see and I
don't think it's intrusive at all; I submitted it because I figured it
might save someone else some work down the line as well.

J.

-- 
noodles is fat
This .sig brought to you by the letter M and the number  5
Product of the Republic of HuggieTag

  reply	other threads:[~2006-02-28 22:31 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2006-02-28 20:59 [PATCH] Make nand block functions use provided byte/word helpers Jonathan McDowell
2006-02-28 22:12 ` Ben Dooks
2006-02-28 22:25   ` Jonathan McDowell [this message]
2006-03-01 11:50     ` Ben Dooks
2006-03-01 12:29       ` Jonathan McDowell

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20060228222559.GC14749@earth.li \
    --to=noodles@earth.li \
    --cc=ben-mtd@fluff.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox