From: "Jörn Engel" <joern@wohnheim.fh-wedel.de>
To: Alexey Zaytsev <alexey.zaytsev@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Random fixes for the ixp4xx mapping driver
Date: Thu, 20 Apr 2006 15:35:00 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20060420133500.GD4047@wohnheim.fh-wedel.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <f19298770604200558r4b29a4d9ma4156539ca54838f@mail.gmail.com>
On Thu, 20 April 2006 16:58:39 +0400, Alexey Zaytsev wrote:
> On 4/20/06, Jörn Engel <joern@wohnheim.fh-wedel.de> wrote:
> > > @@ -151,7 +151,9 @@
> > > struct resource *res;
> > > };
> > >
> > > -static const char *probes[] = { "RedBoot", "cmdlinepart", NULL };
> > > +#ifdef CONFIG_MTD_PARTITIONS
> > > +static const char *probes[] __initdata = { "RedBoot", "cmdlinepart", NULL };
> > > +#endif
> >
> > All this #ifdef mess doesn't make me happy. In this case, it saves 32
> > bytes for people using this driver but not having
> > CONFIG_MTD_PARTITIONS enabled. That's not a very small gain for a
> > very small group. Just make it unconditional.
>
> The gain is not big, but the price is small too. The thing I'm not
> sure about is __initdata.
> Now I see that it may be needed after initialization too, not sure.
The price of a single #ifdef may (and I stress may) be small. But
once the numbers go up, changes become virtually impossible. The only
chance to change #ifdef-happy code is by adding new code and new
#ifdefs. Result is a lot more bloat than just 32 bytes.
Take a look at the U-Boot source if you don't believe me.
End result: stong NACK from me.
> >
> > > static int ixp4xx_flash_remove(struct platform_device *dev)
> > > {
> > > @@ -164,7 +166,9 @@
> > > return 0;
> > >
> > > if (info->mtd) {
> > > +#ifdef CONFIG_MTD_PARTITIONS
> > > del_mtd_partitions(info->mtd);
> > > +#endif
> >
> > In this case, del_mtd_partitions() should be defined to a noop if
> > CONFIG_MTD_PARTITIONS is not defined.
> >
> > > +#ifdef CONFIG_MTD_PARTITIONS
> > > err = parse_mtd_partitions(info->mtd, probes, &info->partitions, 0);
> > > if (err > 0) {
> > > err = add_mtd_partitions(info->mtd, info->partitions, err);
> > > - if(err)
> > > - printk(KERN_ERR "Could not parse partitions\n");
> > > +
> > > }
> > > + if (err < 0)
> > > + printk(KERN_ERR "Could not parse partitions\n");
> > > +#endif
> >
> > Same here. parse_mtd_partitions() should be a noop, the rest can just
> > stay. Gcc should be smart enough to optimize it away.
> >
> > The rest looks fine.
>
> Why do you think nooping functions is better than having #ifdefs? I
> agree that lots of
> #ifdefs make code hard to follow, but if you noop a function, defined
> in some other place,
> someone reading the code may not notice it, and refer to the un-nooped function.
In the header where del_mtd_partitions() and parse_mtd_partitions()
are declared, there should be a single #ifdef:
#ifdef CONFIG_MTD_PARTITIONS
void del_mtd_partitions(...);
int parse_mtd_partitions(...);
#else
static inline void del_mtd_partitions(...) {}
static inline int parse_mtd_partitions(...) { return 0; }
#endif
For the driver you touched alone, three #ifdefs could be removed after
this one is added. Then take a look at all the other drivers and do
the math. ;)
Jörn
--
/* Keep these two variables together */
int bar;
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-04-20 13:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-04-19 19:04 [PATCH] Random fixes for the ixp4xx mapping driver Alexey Zaytsev
2006-04-19 19:52 ` Vitaly Wool
2006-04-19 20:21 ` Alexey Zaytsev
2006-04-20 10:11 ` Jörn Engel
2006-04-20 12:58 ` Alexey Zaytsev
2006-04-20 13:35 ` Jörn Engel [this message]
2006-04-20 13:47 ` Alexey Zaytsev
2006-04-20 13:57 ` Jörn Engel
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20060420133500.GD4047@wohnheim.fh-wedel.de \
--to=joern@wohnheim.fh-wedel.de \
--cc=alexey.zaytsev@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox