From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail.kroah.org ([69.55.234.183] helo=perch.kroah.org) by pentafluge.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.62 #1 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1GEyky-00075N-Ff for linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org; Mon, 21 Aug 2006 02:39:15 +0100 Date: Sun, 20 Aug 2006 18:35:45 -0700 From: Greg KH To: Josh Boyer Subject: Re: 2.6.18-rc4 jffs2 problems Message-ID: <20060821013545.GA21012@kroah.com> References: <1154976111.17725.8.camel@localhost.localdomain> <1155852587.5530.30.camel@localhost.localdomain> <625fc13d0608191834r19ce12e5raccbae011d67c25e@mail.gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <625fc13d0608191834r19ce12e5raccbae011d67c25e@mail.gmail.com> Cc: linux-mtd , Thomas Gleixner , David Woodhouse , LKML List-Id: Linux MTD discussion mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Sat, Aug 19, 2006 at 08:34:46PM -0500, Josh Boyer wrote: > On 8/17/06, Richard Purdie wrote: > >Read the return value before we release the nand device otherwise the > >value can become corrupted by another user of chip->ops, ultimately > >resulting in filesystem corruption. > > > > We have multiple confirmations that this patch fixes the issue > reported. I agree it should go in 2.6.18. > > Greg, can you add this to your tree? Add what to what tree? I need things to be a bit more specific here :) thanks, greg k-h