From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.osdl.org ([65.172.181.25]) by canuck.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.63 #1 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1GpD0n-0003xz-Rn for linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org; Tue, 28 Nov 2006 19:09:26 -0500 Date: Tue, 28 Nov 2006 16:09:02 -0800 From: Andrew Morton To: David Woodhouse Subject: Re: [-mm patch] drivers/mtd/nand/rtc_from4.c: use lib/bitrev.c Message-Id: <20061128160902.915fe8da.akpm@osdl.org> In-Reply-To: <1164754336.14595.29.camel@pmac.infradead.org> References: <20061114014125.dd315fff.akpm@osdl.org> <20061122043811.GG5200@stusta.de> <1164752376.14595.22.camel@pmac.infradead.org> <20061128144907.a9f4bb21.akpm@osdl.org> <1164754336.14595.29.camel@pmac.infradead.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Akinobu Mita , Adrian Bunk List-Id: Linux MTD discussion mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Tue, 28 Nov 2006 22:52:16 +0000 David Woodhouse wrote: > > I'll take that as an ack and shall merge this once > > crc32-replace-bitreverse-by-bitrev32.patch is merged ;) > > I assume the bitrev thing will be going in as soon as 2.6.19 is actually > released, It will take over a week after 2.6.19 - I prefer to wait until the git tree laggards^Wowners have merged before merging -mm stuff, so things land in appropriate order. > so there's no point in me reverting it from the mtd tree? Your call. I do have a fixlet against this patch: --- a/drivers/mtd/nand/rtc_from4.c~drivers-mtd-nand-rtc_from4c-use-lib-bitrevc-tidy +++ a/drivers/mtd/nand/rtc_from4.c @@ -357,7 +357,7 @@ static int rtc_from4_correct_data(struct /* Read the syndrom pattern from the FPGA and correct the bitorder */ rs_ecc = (volatile unsigned short *)(rtc_from4_fio_base + RTC_FROM4_RS_ECC); for (i = 0; i < 8; i++) { - ecc[i] = byte_rev_table[(*rs_ecc) & 0xFF]; + ecc[i] = bitrev8(*rs_ecc); rs_ecc++; } _