From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.nokia.com ([131.228.20.170] helo=mgw-ext11.nokia.com) by canuck.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.63 #1 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1GxPtp-0004s6-Gg for linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org; Thu, 21 Dec 2006 10:32:02 -0500 Date: Thu, 21 Dec 2006 17:30:48 +0200 From: Jarkko Lavinen To: Kyungmin Park Subject: Re: Eraseblocks torture: OneNAND results Message-ID: <20061221153048.GA16357@angel.research.nokia.com> References: <24414989.16841166158970543.JavaMail.weblogic@ep_ml08> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <24414989.16841166158970543.JavaMail.weblogic@ep_ml08> Cc: linux-mtd Reply-To: Jarkko Lavinen List-Id: Linux MTD discussion mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Hi Kyungmin I have tried your patch on an Omap 2420 base test board with OneNand and it seems to work. I had previously run an earlier version of torture test and had some worn out erase blocks available. When I try to erase them I see often controller error occuring and it is caught and returned correctly. But I have also encounted cases where there is no erase error but yet erase verify fails. I then tried a retry aften the failed verify and on the second read the erase block is blanj, all FF, as it should. Jarkko Lavinen