From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pop.scorch.co.nz ([203.167.210.162] helo=firstline.co.nz) by canuck.infradead.org with smtp (Exim 4.63 #1 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1HdXZl-0004GJ-R0 for linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org; Mon, 16 Apr 2007 16:13:27 -0400 From: Charles Manning To: linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org Subject: Re: NAND device ID 0xd5 appears twice in nand_ids.c table Date: Tue, 17 Apr 2007 08:20:11 +1200 References: <6334E09627481B4AA5C8DE1E69E19D3B06BF96E0@SSLEXCHANGE.solomonsystech.com> In-Reply-To: <6334E09627481B4AA5C8DE1E69E19D3B06BF96E0@SSLEXCHANGE.solomonsystech.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200704170820.11068.manningc2@actrix.gen.nz> Cc: sasin@solomon-systech.com List-Id: Linux MTD discussion mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Monday 16 April 2007 21:41, sasin@solomon-systech.com wrote: > NAND device ID 0xd5 appears for a 4MiB device as well as for a 2GiB > device. So when the new 2GiB device is used, it is detected as the > older 4MiB device. Should other ID bytes perhaps be used to > differentiate between the two? This problem will continue as older > device IDs are reused in newer devices. Can't the devices be differentiated by reading the part's geometry info?