From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail.shareable.org ([81.29.64.88]) by canuck.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.63 #1 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1HoHmU-0003qY-VQ for linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org; Wed, 16 May 2007 07:35:00 -0400 Date: Wed, 16 May 2007 12:34:34 +0100 From: Jamie Lokier To: =?iso-8859-1?Q?J=F6rn?= Engel Subject: Re: [PATCH] LogFS take three Message-ID: <20070516113434.GC20482@mail.shareable.org> References: <20070515151919.GA32510@lazybastard.org> <17994.1241.436841.681216@stoffel.org> <20070515191926.GB1220@lazybastard.org> <1179291255.2859.195.camel@shinybook.infradead.org> <20070516110933.GA5472@lazybastard.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <20070516110933.GA5472@lazybastard.org> Cc: akpm@osdl.org, Evgeniy Polyakov , Albert Cahalan , Greg KH , John Stoffel , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Ingo Oeser , Pekka Enberg , linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org, Jan Engelhardt , linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, Thomas Gleixner , David Woodhouse List-Id: Linux MTD discussion mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Jörn Engel wrote: > On Wed, 16 May 2007 12:54:14 +0800, David Woodhouse wrote: > > Personally I'd just go for 'JFFS3'. After all, it has a better claim to > > the name than either of its predecessors :) > > Did you ever see akpm's facial expression when he tried to pronounce > "JFFS2"? ;) JFFS3 is a good, meaningful name to anyone familiar with JFFS2. But if akpm can't pronounce it, how about FFFS for faster flash filesystem.... ;-) -- Jamie