Re: [PATCH] LogFS take three

Jan Engelhardt
2007-05-17T17:39:36Z

On May 16 2007 15:53, Jörn Engel wrote:
>
>My experience is that no matter which name I pick, people will complain
>anyway. Previous suggestions included:
[...]
>
>Plus today:
>FFFS
>flashfs
>fredfs
>bob
>shizzle
>
>Imo they all suck. LogFS also sucks, but it allows me to make a stupid
>joke and keep my logfs.org domain.

Try woodfs! (log - wood - get it?)
But finding names can be so tiresome, just give it a Borg-style
designation - "filesystem 125" or so. fs2007q1, being this
quartal's new filesystem.

Jan
--