From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lazybastard.de ([212.112.238.170] helo=longford.lazybastard.org) by canuck.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.63 #1 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1HoJ6I-0000DT-09 for linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org; Wed, 16 May 2007 08:59:31 -0400 Date: Wed, 16 May 2007 14:55:01 +0200 From: =?utf-8?B?SsO2cm4=?= Engel To: Evgeniy Polyakov Subject: Re: [PATCH] LogFS take three Message-ID: <20070516125501.GG5472@lazybastard.org> References: <20070515151919.GA32510@lazybastard.org> <17994.1241.436841.681216@stoffel.org> <20070515191926.GB1220@lazybastard.org> <1179291255.2859.195.camel@shinybook.infradead.org> <20070516110933.GA5472@lazybastard.org> <20070516113434.GC20482@mail.shareable.org> <20070516115003.GD5472@lazybastard.org> <20070516122921.GA26297@2ka.mipt.ru> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <20070516122921.GA26297@2ka.mipt.ru> Cc: akpm@osdl.org, Albert Cahalan , John Stoffel , Jamie Lokier , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Ingo Oeser , Pekka Enberg , linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org, Jan Engelhardt , Greg KH , linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, Thomas Gleixner , David Woodhouse List-Id: Linux MTD discussion mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Wed, 16 May 2007 16:29:22 +0400, Evgeniy Polyakov wrote: > On Wed, May 16, 2007 at 01:50:03PM +0200, Jörn Engel (joern@lazybastard.org) wrote: > > On Wed, 16 May 2007 12:34:34 +0100, Jamie Lokier wrote: > > > > > > But if akpm can't pronounce it, how about FFFS for faster flash > > > filesystem.... ;-) > > > > How many of you have worked for IBM before? Vowels are not evil. ;) > > Do you think 'eieio' is a good set? IBM's work too... I will let someone else comment on that one. http://www.uwsg.iu.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/0110.1/1294.html Jörn -- There are two ways of constructing a software design: one way is to make it so simple that there are obviously no deficiencies, and the other is to make it so complicated that there are no obvious deficiencies. -- C. A. R. Hoare