Re: [PATCH] LogFS take three

Jamie Lokier
2007-05-16T11:35:00Z

Jörn Engel wrote:
> On Wed, 16 May 2007 12:54:14 +0800, David Woodhouse wrote:
> > Personally I'd just go for 'JFFS3'. After all, it has a better claim to
> > the name than either of its predecessors :)
>
> Did you ever see akpm's facial expression when he tried to pronounce
> "JFFS2"? ;)

JFFS3 is a good, meaningful name to anyone familiar with JFFS2.

But if akpm can't pronounce it, how about FFFS for faster flash
filesystem.... ;-)

-- Jamie