From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from moutng.kundenserver.de ([212.227.126.183]) by canuck.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.63 #1 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1HoeKb-0000oO-KX for linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org; Thu, 17 May 2007 07:39:48 -0400 From: Arnd Bergmann To: =?utf-8?q?J=C3=B6rn_Engel?= Subject: Re: [PATCH] LogFS take three Date: Thu, 17 May 2007 13:39:15 +0200 References: <20070515151919.GA32510@lazybastard.org> <17994.1241.436841.681216@stoffel.org> <20070515191926.GB1220@lazybastard.org> In-Reply-To: <20070515191926.GB1220@lazybastard.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200705171339.16806.arnd@arndb.de> Cc: akpm@osdl.org, Evgeniy Polyakov , Albert Cahalan , Greg KH , John Stoffel , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Ingo Oeser , Pekka Enberg , linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org, Jan Engelhardt , linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, Thomas Gleixner List-Id: Linux MTD discussion mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Tuesday 15 May 2007, J=C3=B6rn Engel wrote: >=20 > > I've been semi watching this, and the only comment I really can give > > is that I hate the name. =C2=A0To me, logfs implies a filesystem for > > logging purposes, not for Flash hardware with wear leveling issues to > > be taken into account. >=20 > Yeah, well, ... >=20 > Two years ago when I started all this, I was looking for a good name. > All I could come up with sounded stupid, so I picked "LogFS" as a code > name. =C2=A0As soon as I find a better name, the code name should get > replaced. >=20 When doing a google search on logfs, there are less than five results among the first 100 that don't refer to your work. The other two listed in there are also log-structured file systems: The inferno flash file system (http://inferno-os.googlecode.com/svn/trunk/liblogfs/) and the (discontinued) file system named lfs from the 2005 google summer of code. I'd say the name should stay, changing it now can only add more confusion. Arnd <><