Re: [PATCH] LogFS take three

Jörn Engel
2007-05-16T11:30:38Z

On Wed, 16 May 2007 12:54:14 +0800, David Woodhouse wrote:
>
> Personally I'd just go for 'JFFS3'. After all, it has a better claim to
> the name than either of its predecessors :)

Did you ever see akpm's facial expression when he tried to pronounce
"JFFS2"? ;)

Jörn

--
Fancy algorithms are slow when n is small, and n is usually small.
Fancy algorithms have big constants. Until you know that n is
frequently going to be big, don't get fancy.
-- Rob Pike