Re: [PATCH] LogFS take three

John Stoffel
2007-05-16T13:42:01Z

JÃ¶rn> On Wed, 16 May 2007 12:34:34 +0100, Jamie Lokier wrote:
>>
>> But if akpm can't pronounce it, how about FFFS for faster flash
>> filesystem.... ;-)

JÃ¶rn> How many of you have worked for IBM before? Vowels are not
evil. ;)

Nope, they're not. I just think that LogFS isn't descriptive enough,
or more accurately, is the *wrong* description of this filesystem.

flashfs works for me. It's longer, but hey, that's ok. Even flshfs
might work. Oh wait, flesh? flash? flush? Too confusing... :-)

John