From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from 42.242.232.72.static.reverse.layeredtech.com ([72.232.242.42] helo=secure.poehali.org) by canuck.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.63 #1 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1Hr8Qu-0006bI-8i for linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org; Thu, 24 May 2007 04:12:31 -0400 Date: Thu, 24 May 2007 11:14:06 +0300 From: Ivan Kuten To: Andrew Victor Subject: Re: PATCH: at91_nand rdy_pin fix Message-ID: <20070524111406.0b11fb5d@newbox> In-Reply-To: <1179992828.13098.26.camel@fuzzie.sanpeople.com> References: <51303.127.0.0.1.1179957194.squirrel@localhost> <1179992828.13098.26.camel@fuzzie.sanpeople.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org List-Id: Linux MTD discussion mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On 24 May 2007 09:47:08 +0200 Andrew Victor wrote: Should I re-diff or you will apply it corrected? BR, Ivan > hi Ivan, > > > - nand_chip->dev_ready = at91_nand_device_ready; > > + > > + if (host->board->rdy_pin) > > + nand_chip->dev_ready = at91_nand_device_ready; > > + else > > + nand_chip->dev_ready = NULL; > > Patch looks correct. > > Since the at91_nand_host structure is allocated with kzalloc(), > nand_chip->dev_ready is already initialized to NULL. > So we don't really need the "else" part. > > > Regards, > Andrew Victor > > > > ______________________________________________________ > Linux MTD discussion mailing list > http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-mtd/