Re: BUG at mm/filemap.c:1749 (2.6.24, jffs2, unionfs)

[Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au>]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1367 bytes --]

On Friday 19 October 2007 16:05, Erez Zadok wrote:
> David,
>
> I'm testing unionfs on top of jffs2, using 2.6.24 as of linus's commit
> 4fa4d23fa20de67df919030c1216295664866ad7.  All of my unionfs tests pass
> when unionfs is stacked on top of jffs2, other than my truncate test --
> whic tries to truncate files up/down (through the union, which then is
> passed through to the lower jffs2 f/s).  The same truncate test passes on
> all other file systems I've tried unionfs/2.6.24 with, as well as all of
> the earlier kernels that unionfs runs on (2.6.9--2.6.23).  So I tend to
> think this bug is more probably due to something else going on in 2.6.24,
> possibly wrt jffs2/mtd.  (Of course, it's still possible that unionfs isn't
> doing something right -- any pointers?)
>
> The oops trace is included below.  Is this a known issue and if so, any
> fixes?  If this is the first you hear of this problem, let me know and I'll
> try to narrow it down further.

It's had quite a lot of recent changes in that area -- the "new aops"
patches.

They've been getting quite a bit of testing in -mm and no such problems,
but I doubt anyone was doing much unionfs over jffs2, or even much jffs2
testing with -mm.

The bug smells like jffs2 is actually passing back a "written" length
greater than the length we passed into it.

The following might show what's happening.

[-- Attachment #2: mm-debug.patch --]
[-- Type: text/x-diff, Size: 738 bytes --]

Index: linux-2.6/mm/filemap.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.orig/mm/filemap.c
+++ linux-2.6/mm/filemap.c
@@ -2184,6 +2184,7 @@ fs_write_aop_error:
 	return written ? written : status;
 }
 
+#include <linux/kallsyms.h>
 static ssize_t generic_perform_write(struct file *file,
 				struct iov_iter *i, loff_t pos)
 {
@@ -2243,6 +2244,13 @@ again:
 						page, fsdata);
 		if (unlikely(status < 0))
 			break;
+		if (status > copied) {
+			print_symbol("%s returned more than it should!\n", (unsigned long)a_ops->write_end);
+			printk("status = %ld, copied = %lu\n", status, copied);
+			dump_stack();
+			status = copied; /* try to fix */
+		}
+
 		copied = status;
 
 		cond_resched();