From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lazybastard.de ([212.112.238.170] helo=longford.lazybastard.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.66 #1 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1ImWUh-0001Bs-RP for linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org; Mon, 29 Oct 2007 11:25:43 -0400 Date: Mon, 29 Oct 2007 15:38:18 +0100 From: =?utf-8?B?SsO2cm4=?= Engel To: David Woodhouse Subject: Re: jffs2: too few erase blocks Message-ID: <20071029143818.GA29885@lazybastard.org> References: <79ac09b60710250706p22034159v3b1c644b3a07e7ab@mail.gmail.com> <20071025092225.410ca383@weaponx.rchland.ibm.com> <20071025221553.GA29785@mail.shareable.org> <79ac09b60710261000y2c5a56d4x34ba3f00f657630f@mail.gmail.com> <79ac09b60710261402h3cf9dfa5o1ce9e33e5468d742@mail.gmail.com> <20071028180223.GB14076@mail.shareable.org> <1193626747.2915.87.camel@shinybook.infradead.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <1193626747.2915.87.camel@shinybook.infradead.org> Cc: linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org, Josh Boyer , Jamie Lokier , Duke List-Id: Linux MTD discussion mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Sun, 28 October 2007 22:59:07 -0400, David Woodhouse wrote: > > Yes, it does. In fact, on NOR flash you get entirely synchronous > behaviour even _without_ explicit syncs -- effectively the same as > MS_SYNC. On older ones. There appears to be a tendency for newer flashes to require wbuf and hence sync. Jörn -- Joern's library part 4: http://www.paulgraham.com/spam.html