From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lazybastard.de ([212.112.238.170] helo=longford.lazybastard.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.68 #1 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1Iutir-00011t-8k for linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org; Wed, 21 Nov 2007 12:50:55 -0500 Date: Wed, 21 Nov 2007 18:45:42 +0100 From: =?utf-8?B?SsO2cm4=?= Engel To: Vitaly Wool Subject: Re: Some news for this: [PATCH] [MTD] BLOCK_RO: Readonly Block Device Layer Over MTD ? Message-ID: <20071121174541.GF20871@lazybastard.org> References: <305035a40711210627p1ea1f2c0me1ee1f8e8d124552@mail.gmail.com> <20071121160804.GC20871@lazybastard.org> <305035a40711210828k65174f44t3d64e9ee33fe26bf@mail.gmail.com> <20071121105817.3adbfbb5@weaponx> <20071121171501.GE20871@lazybastard.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: Cc: linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org, =?utf-8?B?SsO2cm4=?= Engel , Gregory CLEMENT List-Id: Linux MTD discussion mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Wed, 21 November 2007 20:43:14 +0300, Vitaly Wool wrote: > On Nov 21, 2007 8:15 PM, Jörn Engel wrote: > > But why yet another mtdblock driver? Is there a reason not to add the > > required bits to mtdblock_ro.c? > > Because we were explicitly directed by David to do so. And David has gone fishing. Did he tell you why? Jörn -- Fools ignore complexity. Pragmatists suffer it. Some can avoid it. Geniuses remove it. -- Perlis's Programming Proverb #58, SIGPLAN Notices, Sept. 1982