public inbox for linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Jörn Engel" <joern@logfs.org>
To: Roel Kluin <12o3l@tiscali.nl>
Cc: linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org, dwmw2@infradead.org
Subject: Re: [MTD] potential division by 0 in cfi_build_cmd() and cfi_merge_status()?
Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2008 04:01:03 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080115030103.GA19407@lazybastard.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <478BFE1C.1090608@tiscali.nl>

On Tue, 15 January 2008 01:28:12 +0100, Roel Kluin wrote:
> 
> Doing some grepping, I stumbled upon this possible error:
> 
> in include/linux/mtd/cfi.h, lines 302 and 366, resp. functions
> cfi_build_cmd() and cfi_merge_status() there is a division by
> cfi_interleave(cfi):
> 
> chip_mode = map_bankwidth(map) / cfi_interleave(cfi);
> 
> This could be problematic when No CONFIG_MTD_CFI_Ix is selected:
> cfi_interleave will triggers BUG(), but when BUG is disabled, the
> function returns 0, causing a subsequent division by zero.
> 
> When a CONFIG_MTD_CFI_Ix is selected, cfi_interleave(cfi) is either
> defined 1 or defined (cfi)->interleave.
> 
> cfi is a struct cfi_private pointer, with interleave as an int.
> 
> I am not sure whether interleave can ever be 0 in this division when 
> CONFIG_MTD_CFI_Ix is set.
> 
> shouldn't there be an error exit when cfi_interleave(cfi) evaluates
> to 0?

I don't think cfi_interleave(cfi) will ever be 0.  But the functions
definitely look a bit large for inlines.  Anyone having both cfi_probe
and jedec_probe will enjoy twice the kernel footprint from them.
Patches to move that code out-of-line are welcome.

Jörn

-- 
Fools ignore complexity.  Pragmatists suffer it.
Some can avoid it.  Geniuses remove it.
-- Perlis's Programming Proverb #58, SIGPLAN Notices, Sept.  1982

  reply	other threads:[~2008-01-15  3:10 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-01-15  0:28 [MTD] potential division by 0 in cfi_build_cmd() and cfi_merge_status()? Roel Kluin
2008-01-15  3:01 ` Jörn Engel [this message]
2008-01-15  4:06   ` Nicolas Pitre
2008-01-15  4:10     ` Jörn Engel

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20080115030103.GA19407@lazybastard.org \
    --to=joern@logfs.org \
    --cc=12o3l@tiscali.nl \
    --cc=dwmw2@infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox