From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lazybastard.de ([212.112.238.170] helo=longford.lazybastard.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.68 #1 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1JRs24-0002KH-TX for linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org; Wed, 20 Feb 2008 16:42:57 +0000 Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2008 17:42:27 +0100 From: =?utf-8?B?SsO2cm4=?= Engel To: Stephane Chazelas Subject: Re: [PATCH 2.6.24] block2mtd: removing a device and typo fixes Message-ID: <20080220164226.GF5539@lazybastard.org> References: <20080212152124.GA21878@lazybastard.org> <20080219150822.GA29587@lazybastard.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: Cc: =?utf-8?B?SsO2cm4=?= Engel , linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Arnd Bergmann List-Id: Linux MTD discussion mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Wed, 20 February 2008 14:36:46 +0000, Stephane Chazelas wrote: > > At the moment, when we bind a mtd device to a block device, we > don't increase the refcount. When a mtdblock on a block2mtd, the > refcount is not increased either (the mtdblock's one is I > guess). That is a bug then. Jörn -- The story so far: In the beginning the Universe was created. This has made a lot of people very angry and been widely regarded as a bad move. -- Douglas Adams