public inbox for linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To: "Gordon Farquharson" <gordonfarquharson@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: physmap and "request_module: runaway loop modprobe net-pf-1"
Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2008 00:19:18 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080312001918.78b6f7bd.akpm@linux-foundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <97a0a9ac0803120006k30a0ef7dq7b67518bca384b03@mail.gmail.com>

On Wed, 12 Mar 2008 01:06:53 -0600 "Gordon Farquharson" <gordonfarquharson@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi Andrew
> 
> On Tue, Mar 11, 2008 at 11:59 PM, Andrew Morton
> <akpm@linux-foundation.org> wrote:
> > On Tue, 11 Mar 2008 23:35:28 -0600 "Gordon Farquharson" <gordonfarquharson@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> >  > Alternatively, if selecting CONFIG_MTD_PARTITIONS and not selecting
> >  > both CONFIG_MTD_REDBOOT_PARTS and CONFIG_CMDLINE_PARTS, or selecting
> >  > CONFIG_MTD_PARTITIONS and not selecting CONFIG_CMDLINE_PARTS and
> >  > selecting CONFIG_MTD_REDBOOT_PARTS as a module, are valid
> >  > configurations, it seems that parse_mtd_partitions() must be called
> >  > only after af_unix_init() has been called. Is this possible?
> >
> >  Probably.
> >
> >  We can specify the order in which these things are called at compile-time.
> >  See these, from include/linux/init.h:
> >
> >  #define core_initcall(fn)               __define_initcall("1",fn,1)
> >  #define postcore_initcall(fn)           __define_initcall("2",fn,2)
> >  #define arch_initcall(fn)               __define_initcall("3",fn,3)
> >  #define subsys_initcall(fn)             __define_initcall("4",fn,4)
> >  #define fs_initcall(fn)                 __define_initcall("5",fn,5)
> >  #define rootfs_initcall(fn)             __define_initcall("rootfs",fn,rootfs)
> >  #define device_initcall(fn)             __define_initcall("6",fn,6)
> >  #define late_initcall(fn)               __define_initcall("7",fn,7)
> >
> >  Now, af_unix_init() uses module_init(), which is really __initcall(), which
> >  is really device_initcall() (ug, don't ask).
> >
> >  So you can do what you're sugesting here by locating the caller/callers of
> >  parse_mtd_partitions() and marking them late_initcall().
> 
> Thanks very much for the explanation.
> 
> It looks like there could be up to 38 distinct callers of
> parse_mtd_partitions(), and I expect that one would need to test all
> of the various platforms on which these calls occur to ensure that
> there were no regressions introduced by the change, so this option
> scares me a little.
> 
> $ grep parse_mtd_partitions -r * | wc -l
> 38

err, yes, scrub that.

> >  I'd suggest that you make your own decision as to what is the best fix, then
> >  send a patch.  Please cc me on it and I'll make sure that it gets
> >  appropriately handled.  This may take a bit of time, as the MTD patch
> >  backlog is rather large at present.
> 
> I'll see how the MTD guys respond today,

There's a good chance that there will be no response.

> and then submit a patch
> later. I like option 1, but they may have a good reason for needing to
> compile a parser as a module, or they may propose a completely
> different solution. Right now, there is only one defconfig that has
> CONFIG_REDBOOT_MTD_PARTS=m:
> 
> arch/mips/configs/mtx1_defconfig:CONFIG_MTD_REDBOOT_PARTS=m
> 

Just send the patch, please.  Please retain you original analysis in its
covering description.

  reply	other threads:[~2008-03-12  7:19 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <97a0a9ac0803112235l157706adoa84b131549a46049@mail.gmail.com>
2008-03-12  5:59 ` physmap and "request_module: runaway loop modprobe net-pf-1" Andrew Morton
2008-03-12  7:06   ` Gordon Farquharson
2008-03-12  7:19     ` Andrew Morton [this message]
2008-03-12  7:36   ` David Woodhouse
2008-04-22 12:37   ` David Woodhouse
2008-04-24  4:01     ` Gordon Farquharson
2008-04-24  5:49       ` David Woodhouse
2008-04-24  6:10         ` David Miller
2008-04-24  7:16           ` David Woodhouse
2008-04-24  7:20             ` David Miller
2008-04-24  7:24               ` David Woodhouse
2008-04-24  7:58                 ` David Miller

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20080312001918.78b6f7bd.akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --to=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=gordonfarquharson@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox