From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp120.sbc.mail.sp1.yahoo.com ([69.147.64.93]) by bombadil.infradead.org with smtp (Exim 4.68 #1 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1JhyLb-0005WO-87 for linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org; Sat, 05 Apr 2008 02:41:39 +0000 From: David Brownell To: "Kyungmin Park" Subject: Re: [PATCH] jffs2 summary allocation Date: Fri, 4 Apr 2008 19:17:04 -0700 References: <713171.37644.qm@web26213.mail.ukl.yahoo.com> <1207357870.3224.89.camel@vader.jdub.homelinux.org> <9c9fda240804041829r5a768b39n340926485aa12687@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <9c9fda240804041829r5a768b39n340926485aa12687@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200804041917.05294.david-b@pacbell.net> Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.arm.linux.org.uk, linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org, Michael Trimarchi , spi-devel-general@lists.sourceforge.net, Josh Boyer , dwmw2@infradead.org, Andrew Morton List-Id: Linux MTD discussion mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Friday 04 April 2008, Kyungmin Park wrote: > So I now changed the kmalloc eraseblock to vmalloc at both jffs2 and mtd-utils. I hope you meant: vmalloc changed to kmalloc? And mtd-utils is userspace, not kernel, so it can't care...