From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail2.shareable.org ([80.68.89.115]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.68 #1 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1JmtwX-0008HD-CJ for linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org; Fri, 18 Apr 2008 17:00:09 +0000 Date: Fri, 18 Apr 2008 17:59:57 +0100 From: Jamie Lokier To: Josh Boyer Subject: Re: [U-Boot-Users] ubi and u-boot Message-ID: <20080418165957.GG31520@shareable.org> References: <4808AE6F.4030505@largestprime.net> <1208536808.6654.6.camel@vader.jdub.homelinux.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1208536808.6654.6.camel@vader.jdub.homelinux.org> Cc: u-boot-users@lists.sourceforge.net, Bernard Blackham , linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org List-Id: Linux MTD discussion mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Josh Boyer wrote: > On Fri, 2008-04-18 at 22:21 +0800, Bernard Blackham wrote: > > [apologies for the cross post] > > Is anyone working on ubi/ubifs support in u-boot? > > I am not aware of anyone actively working on porting UBI to upstream > U-Boot at this exact moment. Is it even a good idea? The UBI (version 1 :-) initial scan is not fast for large flash, and if the bootloader does it too, that's twice as much time to boot. However, if there was a protocol for bootloader to pass the scan results to the booted kernel, that would be very nice. -- Jamie