From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from [74.93.104.97] (helo=sunset.davemloft.net) by pentafluge.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.68 #1 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1Joufc-00085W-P3 for linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org; Thu, 24 Apr 2008 06:11:01 +0000 Date: Wed, 23 Apr 2008 23:10:55 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <20080423.231055.193687131.davem@davemloft.net> To: dwmw2@infradead.org Subject: Re: physmap and "request_module: runaway loop modprobe net-pf-1" From: David Miller In-Reply-To: <1209016143.9212.910.camel@pmac.infradead.org> References: <1208867831.9212.582.camel@pmac.infradead.org> <97a0a9ac0804232101i71bfff22o723e2aaa80b09c2f@mail.gmail.com> <1209016143.9212.910.camel@pmac.infradead.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, gordonfarquharson@gmail.com, linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: Linux MTD discussion mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , From: David Woodhouse Date: Thu, 24 Apr 2008 06:49:03 +0100 > On Wed, 2008-04-23 at 22:01 -0600, Gordon Farquharson wrote: > > I guess the question is which patch (if either) is more appealing. > > I definitely think we should initialise AF_UNIX sockets earlier. At > least request_module() _can_ work then, if you want it to and you set up > userspace accordingly. I'm not so sure, for example, what if AF_UNIX is built modular?