From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from risingsoftware01.propagation.net ([66.221.33.65]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.68 #1 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1JtJl2-0003hD-Ao for linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org; Tue, 06 May 2008 09:46:48 +0000 Date: Tue, 6 May 2008 19:46:42 +1000 From: Hamish Moffatt To: Artem Bityutskiy Subject: Re: [PATCH] mkfs.ubifs: support --squash-uids Message-ID: <20080506094642.GB23685@cloud.net.au> References: <20080502051655.GA6654@cloud.net.au> <1209972672.3645.8.camel@sauron> <20080505084617.GA11042@cloud.net.au> <1210055916.3645.21.camel@sauron> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1210055916.3645.21.camel@sauron> Cc: linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org List-Id: Linux MTD discussion mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Tue, May 06, 2008 at 09:38:36AM +0300, Artem Bityutskiy wrote: > I've committed your patch and will do the "prefer dev. table" change Thanks. > later. Just a note - the patch was against some old mkfs.ubifs, so I had > to do conflict resolution. Also note, we changed -p (--orph-lebs) option > to -P at some point. You are unlikely using it - this is just for > information. Yes it was against the v0.4 tag. mkfs.jffs2 and genext2fs both use -P as the short version of --squash-perms, so mkfs.ubifs will have to use something different. No big deal however (although they are pretty similar otherwise). Also, what is the purpose of --max-leb-cnt? It seems to be just a safety check that the volume will fit? It's a bit unusual. thanks Hamish -- Hamish Moffatt VK3SB