From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lazybastard.de ([212.112.238.170] helo=longford.logfs.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.68 #1 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1Ju84z-0004ru-FV for linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org; Thu, 08 May 2008 15:30:46 +0000 Date: Thu, 8 May 2008 17:30:38 +0200 From: =?utf-8?B?SsO2cm4=?= Engel To: Alexander Belyakov Subject: Re: [PATCH][RFC] NAND subpage read feature. Take 2. Message-ID: <20080508153038.GC14141@logfs.org> References: <20080501202523.GA17828@logfs.org> <20080505073745.GA13916@logfs.org> <20080505153959.GA17330@logfs.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: Cc: dwmw2@infradead.org, tglx@linutronix.de, linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org, Alexey Korolev List-Id: Linux MTD discussion mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Tue, 6 May 2008 13:29:09 +0400, Alexander Belyakov wrote: > > Thanks. I believe mtd caching deserves separate discussion, because > too many mtd things are going to be affected. Indeed. For that very reason I've kept the caching part of logfs for now. It is not a trivial decision to make and regressions can show up in surprising places. Jörn -- Joern's library part 10: http://blogs.msdn.com/David_Gristwood/archive/2004/06/24/164849.aspx