From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from [85.21.88.6] (helo=buildserver.ru.mvista.com) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.68 #1 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1KCGN9-0001AN-Dn for linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org; Fri, 27 Jun 2008 16:00:27 +0000 Date: Fri, 27 Jun 2008 20:00:19 +0400 From: Anton Vorontsov To: Scott Wood Subject: Re: [PATCH] MTD: NAND: fsl_elbc_nand: implement support for flash-based BBT Message-ID: <20080627160019.GA32374@polina.dev.rtsoft.ru> References: <20080626184156.GA2356@polina.dev.rtsoft.ru> <48648662.1050107@call-direct.com.au> <20080627145512.GA11372@polina.dev.rtsoft.ru> <4865079A.2020300@freescale.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4865079A.2020300@freescale.com> Cc: linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org, David Woodhouse , Iwo Mergler Reply-To: avorontsov@ru.mvista.com List-Id: Linux MTD discussion mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Fri, Jun 27, 2008 at 10:30:34AM -0500, Scott Wood wrote: > Anton Vorontsov wrote: >> Just looked into x16 LP NAND spec, and it says that block should be >> considered as bad when the first _Word_ isn't 0xff. So we indeed should >> not ignore the second byte. Ouch. > > The FCM doesn't support 16-bit devices. And will never support? Then maybe, in addition, we could apply the first patch that you've acked so we'll unbreak NANDs for pour souls that tried to reflash the JFFS2 into NAND, so that they'll will not have to "nand scrub" their NANDs? >> How about this patch? > > ACK Thanks, -- Anton Vorontsov email: cbouatmailru@gmail.com irc://irc.freenode.net/bd2