Re: [PATCH] MTD: NAND: fsl_elbc_nand: implement support for flash-based BBT

Scott Wood
2008-06-27T15:30:34Z

Anton Vorontsov wrote:
> Just looked into x16 LP NAND spec, and it says that block should be
> considered as bad when the first _Word_ isn't 0xff. So we indeed should
> not ignore the second byte. Ouch.

The FCM doesn't support 16-bit devices.

> How about this patch?

ACK

-Scott