From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp104.mail.mud.yahoo.com ([209.191.85.214]) by bombadil.infradead.org with smtp (Exim 4.68 #1 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1KWMSH-0002wv-3E for linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org; Fri, 22 Aug 2008 02:32:49 +0000 From: Nick Piggin To: "Jared Hulbert" Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/10] AXFS: Advanced XIP filesystem Date: Fri, 22 Aug 2008 12:32:41 +1000 References: <48AD00C4.6060302@gmail.com> <200808212043.51209.nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au> <6934efce0808210713m220d2a6cje06a2dc51c4a857a@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <6934efce0808210713m220d2a6cje06a2dc51c4a857a@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200808221232.42115.nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au> Cc: linux-embedded@vger.kernel.org, carsteno@de.ibm.com, =?utf-8?q?J=C3=B6rn?= Engel , Linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mtd , tim.bird@am.sony.com List-Id: Linux MTD discussion mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Friday 22 August 2008 00:13, Jared Hulbert wrote: > > Agreed. I haven't had a good look through it yet, but at a glance it > > looks pretty neat. The VM side of things looks pretty reasonable > > (I fear XIP faulting might have another race or two, but that's a > > core mm issue rather than filesystem specific). > > How might I design a test to flush those bugs out? We haven't seen any. Not quite sure yet. I just fixed a couple of easy ones, but there could be some more lurking. Don't be too worried about it yet, I was just musing to myself there really :)