From: Andres Salomon <dilinger@queued.net>
To: linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH] jffs2: force the jffs2 GC daemon to behave a bit better
Date: Sun, 2 Nov 2008 13:04:49 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20081102130449.0aa74adb@fred> (raw)
I've noticed some pretty poor behavior on OLPC machines after bootup, when
gdm/X are starting. The GCD monopolizes the scheduler (which in turns means
it gets to do more nand i/o), which results in processes taking much much
longer than they should to start.
As an example, on an OLPC machine going from OFW to a usable X (via auto-login
gdm) takes 2m 30s. The majority of this time is consumed by the switch into
graphical mode. With this patch, we cut a full 60s off of bootup time. After
bootup, things are much snappier as well.
Note that we have seen a CRC node error with this patch that causes the machine
to fail to boot, but we've also seen that problem without this patch.
Signed-off-by: Andres Salomon <dilinger@debian.org>
---
fs/jffs2/background.c | 18 +++++++++++-------
1 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/jffs2/background.c b/fs/jffs2/background.c
index 8adebd3..f38d557 100644
--- a/fs/jffs2/background.c
+++ b/fs/jffs2/background.c
@@ -95,13 +95,17 @@ static int jffs2_garbage_collect_thread(void *_c)
schedule();
}
- /* This thread is purely an optimisation. But if it runs when
- other things could be running, it actually makes things a
- lot worse. Use yield() and put it at the back of the runqueue
- every time. Especially during boot, pulling an inode in
- with read_inode() is much preferable to having the GC thread
- get there first. */
- yield();
+ /* Problem - immediately after bootup, the GCD spends a lot
+ * of time in places like jffs2_kill_fragtree(); so much so
+ * that userspace processes (like gdm and X) are starved
+ * despite plenty of cond_resched()s and renicing. Yield()
+ * doesn't help, either (presumably because userspace and GCD
+ * are generally competing for a higher latency resource -
+ * disk).
+ * This forces the GCD to slow the hell down. Pulling an
+ * inode in with read_inode() is much preferable to having
+ * the GC thread get there first. */
+ schedule_timeout_interruptible(msecs_to_jiffies(50));
/* Put_super will send a SIGKILL and then wait on the sem.
*/
--
1.5.6.5
next reply other threads:[~2008-11-02 18:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-11-02 18:04 Andres Salomon [this message]
2008-11-05 3:49 ` [PATCH] jffs2: force the jffs2 GC daemon to behave a bit better Andrew Morton
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20081102130449.0aa74adb@fred \
--to=dilinger@queued.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox