From: Jamie Lokier <jamie@shareable.org>
To: Trent Piepho <tpiepho@freescale.com>
Cc: Arnaud Mouiche <arnaud.mouiche@thomson.net>,
Andre Puschman <andre.puschmann@imms.de>,
MTD mailing list <linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: flash read performance
Date: Fri, 7 Nov 2008 05:57:08 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20081107055708.GG17593@shareable.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0811062121130.3864@t2.domain.actdsltmp>
Trent Piepho wrote:
> On Fri, 7 Nov 2008, Jamie Lokier wrote:
> > Based on Andre's observation, I will soon try enabling cache for my
> > NOR, and see if it makes a difference to cold-cache read performance.
> > I don't expect it, but it's worth a try.
>
> It possible it could help by efficiently doing the reads back-to-back with
> no wasted cycles between them. I think it's necessary if you want to
> benefit from page mode, but that's something I haven't tried yet.
>
> > You might also find the write operation to be unreliable, if the
> > caching mode is write-back rather than write-through.
>
> Proper use of "sync" instructions, or whatever the arch uses to insure that
> writel() is strictly ordered should fix that.
I think that won't work because strongly ordered writes don't
translate directly to bus transactions when the region is mapped with
ioremap_cached(). The flash wants exact bus transactions.
-- Jamie
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-11-07 5:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-10-28 10:14 flash read performance Andre Puschmann
2008-10-29 11:42 ` Josh Boyer
2008-10-29 12:03 ` Jamie Lokier
2008-10-29 15:52 ` Andre Puschmann
2008-10-30 8:33 ` Arnaud Mouiche
2008-10-30 9:52 ` Andre Puschmann
2008-10-30 10:06 ` Arnaud Mouiche
2008-11-03 14:23 ` Andre Puschmann
2008-11-04 8:30 ` Andre Puschmann
2008-11-04 11:42 ` Jamie Lokier
2008-11-04 14:31 ` Andre Puschman
2008-11-07 2:41 ` Trent Piepho
2008-11-07 4:02 ` Jamie Lokier
2008-11-07 5:36 ` Trent Piepho
2008-11-07 5:57 ` Jamie Lokier [this message]
2008-11-07 9:47 ` Andre Puschmann
2008-11-08 5:28 ` Trent Piepho
2008-11-11 13:28 ` Andre Puschmann
2008-11-15 2:02 ` Trent Piepho
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20081107055708.GG17593@shareable.org \
--to=jamie@shareable.org \
--cc=andre.puschmann@imms.de \
--cc=arnaud.mouiche@thomson.net \
--cc=linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=tpiepho@freescale.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox