From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lazybastard.de ([212.112.238.170] helo=longford.logfs.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.68 #1 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1L1lWy-0002Sp-B4 for linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org; Sun, 16 Nov 2008 17:35:28 +0000 Date: Sun, 16 Nov 2008 18:34:54 +0100 From: =?utf-8?B?SsO2cm4=?= Engel To: Mike Frysinger Subject: Re: [PATCH] mtd: unify mtd partition/device registration Message-ID: <20081116173453.GA703@logfs.org> References: <1226533133-7405-1-git-send-email-vapier@gentoo.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <1226533133-7405-1-git-send-email-vapier@gentoo.org> Cc: David Woodhouse , linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: Linux MTD discussion mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Wed, 12 November 2008 18:38:53 -0500, Mike Frysinger wrote: > > Rather than having every map/mtd driver doing the same sequence of > registering partitions and/or devices, implement common parse_mtd(). I just added partitioning support to block2mtd. Looks like I might rethink the patch. :) > @@ -292,6 +292,43 @@ void put_mtd_device(struct mtd_info *mtd) > module_put(mtd->owner); > } > > +#include #include in the middle of the code? Jörn -- Happiness isn't having what you want, it's wanting what you have. -- unknown