From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp123.sbc.mail.sp1.yahoo.com ([69.147.64.96]) by bombadil.infradead.org with smtp (Exim 4.68 #1 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1L8fCY-0003GQ-N2 for linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org; Fri, 05 Dec 2008 18:14:55 +0000 From: David Brownell To: Adrian Hunter Subject: Re: [PATCH] OneNAND: OMAP2: Switch to generic gpio calls Date: Fri, 5 Dec 2008 10:14:49 -0800 References: <1228289844-5897-1-git-send-email-jarkko.nikula@nokia.com> <1228289844-5897-3-git-send-email-jarkko.nikula@nokia.com> <49391D78.90407@nokia.com> In-Reply-To: <49391D78.90407@nokia.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200812051014.50439.david-b@pacbell.net> Cc: linux-mtd Mailing List , linux-omap Mailing List , David Woodhouse , Jarkko Nikula List-Id: Linux MTD discussion mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Friday 05 December 2008, Adrian Hunter wrote: > -               if ((r = omap_request_gpio(c->gpio_irq)) < 0) { > +               if ((r = gpio_request(c->gpio_irq, "OneNAND irq")) < 0) { Worth noting that this depends on the OMAP patches which make those calls be equivalent. Those patches are going into 2.6.29-early via the ARM tree, as I recall; getting the merge order wrong would break bisectability -- but not buildability. - Dave