From: Alexander Clouter <alex@digriz.org.uk>
To: Lennert Buytenhek <buytenh@wantstofly.org>
Cc: linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] [MTD] NAND: add ts7xxx driver
Date: Sun, 8 Feb 2009 10:39:04 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090208103904.GE11872@woodchuck> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090208102147.GL13433@xi.wantstofly.org>
Hi,
* Lennert Buytenhek <buytenh@wantstofly.org> [2009-02-08 11:21:47+0100]:
>
> On Sun, Feb 08, 2009 at 08:59:19AM +0000, Alexander Clouter wrote:
> >
> > This patch adds support for the NAND found in Technologic Systems ARM
> > boards[1]. The platform specific parts (IO address and parititoning
> > schemes) have been moved into platform specific files whilst the driver
> > it's self can be used as a complete replacement for the ts7250 NAND
> > driver.
>
> Why don't you morph the ts7250 into the form you want instead of adding
> a parallel driver for the same thing?
>
...because when I sent this to you last year for some offlist comment
action you did not grumble that it was a separate driver. Then after a
year of reposting twice to this list with no comment or feedback what so
ever I guess I made the mistake of assuming it was not 'displeasing' to
the community.
Sorry to sound grumpy, but after trying to post cpufreq, timeriomem,
nand and arm patches over the past two years with a 90% resulting in the
silent treatment it feels like a brick has hit me in the face with "hey
instead just morph the current driver".
Bah.
</rant>
The driver I threw together makes a rather radical change to put all the
partitioning and iomem resources ranges back into the platform specific
code where they belong. It was just easier to start clean, plus I
learnt a good deal about the MTD subsystem in the process, although
that's not a good reason for submission I know.
As the feedback from ts72[056]0 users has been pretty...well...dire and
I have no access to the platform I cannot be certain this patch safely
works for those users. I had the view that once I can get a solid
confirmation that the ts72[056]0 users are happy I was hoping that the
7250.c driver would just become obsolete?
So, is it back to square one for me?
Cheers
--
Alexander Clouter
.sigmonster says: You will never know hunger.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-02-08 10:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-02-08 8:59 [PATCH] [MTD] NAND: add ts7xxx driver Alexander Clouter
2009-02-08 10:21 ` Lennert Buytenhek
2009-02-08 10:39 ` Alexander Clouter [this message]
2009-02-08 10:52 ` Alexander Clouter
2009-02-08 10:56 ` Alexander Clouter
2009-02-09 16:56 ` hartleys
2009-02-09 17:05 ` Alexander Clouter
2009-02-09 19:00 ` hartleys
2009-02-09 19:56 ` Alexander Clouter
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20090208103904.GE11872@woodchuck \
--to=alex@digriz.org.uk \
--cc=buytenh@wantstofly.org \
--cc=linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox