From: David Brownell <david-b@pacbell.net>
To: "vimal singh" <vimalsingh@ti.com>
Cc: davinci-linux-open-source@linux.davincidsp.com,
nsnehaprabha@ti.com, linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org,
akpm@linux-foundation.org, dwmw2@infradead.org,
tglx@linutronix.de
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] NAND on DM355: Add 4-bit ECC support for large page NAND chips
Date: Thu, 7 May 2009 09:54:10 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200905070954.10987.david-b@pacbell.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <41906.192.168.10.89.1241689856.squirrel@dbdmail.itg.ti.com>
On Thursday 07 May 2009, vimal singh wrote:
> >> How about leaving bytes '4' and '5' for bad block marker, to support 16-bit
> >> NAND parts too.
> >
> > This 4-bit ECC engine only works for 8-bit wide parts ...
> > or are you suggesting that in case TI re-engineers that
> > engine in the future?
>
> I am omap guy and was not aware of that. In omap HW BCH
> ECC (4- or 8- bit correction)can work both kind of memories.
I'm somewhat more of an OMAP guy too -- just got sucked in to
trying to get a dm355 board to run off NAND in mainline-bound
code, and you can see where that landed me!
Last I looked at the OMAP2/OMAP3 NAND controller driver, it
didn't yet support most fancy hardware features, like ECC
using more than one bit or the prefetch/postwrite logic.
One nice feature of that OMAP2/OMAP3 controller, beyond the
support for 8 bit ECC, is that it buffers the ECC syndrome
data so that it doesn't need NAND_ECC_HW_OOB_FIRST logic to
prevent trashing the manufacturer OOB markers. The limit
of max 4K pages seems like not a big worry for now.
- Dave
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-05-07 16:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <46149.192.168.10.89.1241686786.squirrel@dbdmail.itg.ti.com>
2009-05-07 9:50 ` [PATCH 2/2] NAND on DM355: Add 4-bit ECC support for large page NAND chips vimal singh
2009-05-07 16:54 ` David Brownell [this message]
[not found] <43965.192.168.10.89.1241763647.squirrel@dbdmail.itg.ti.com>
2009-05-09 4:24 ` vimal singh
2009-05-07 8:59 vimal singh
2009-05-07 9:11 ` David Brownell
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2009-05-07 2:29 nsnehaprabha
2009-05-07 7:16 ` David Brownell
2009-05-07 14:13 ` Narnakaje, Snehaprabha
2009-05-07 17:11 ` David Brownell
2009-05-07 18:02 ` Narnakaje, Snehaprabha
2009-05-07 22:37 ` Troy Kisky
2009-05-08 0:03 ` Narnakaje, Snehaprabha
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200905070954.10987.david-b@pacbell.net \
--to=david-b@pacbell.net \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=davinci-linux-open-source@linux.davincidsp.com \
--cc=dwmw2@infradead.org \
--cc=linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=nsnehaprabha@ti.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=vimalsingh@ti.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox