From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from metis.ext.pengutronix.de ([2001:6f8:1178:4:290:27ff:fe1d:cc33]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.69 #1 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1MDhpJ-00032A-D7 for linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org; Mon, 08 Jun 2009 16:36:04 +0000 Date: Mon, 8 Jun 2009 18:35:40 +0200 From: Wolfram Sang To: Grant Likely Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 2/2] mtd/maps/mtd-ram: add an of-platform driver Message-ID: <20090608163540.GA16384@pengutronix.de> References: <1244203514-12516-1-git-send-email-w.sang@pengutronix.de> <1244203514-12516-3-git-send-email-w.sang@pengutronix.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="XsQoSWH+UP9D9v3l" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Cc: devicetree-discuss@ozlabs.org, albrecht.dress@arcor.de, linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org, Ben Dooks , David Woodhouse List-Id: Linux MTD discussion mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , --XsQoSWH+UP9D9v3l Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable > Question: why is bank-width even relevant for a RAM device? The underlying map_ram-driver uses it once while erasing. The question rema= ins if this is really needed? And: Does this need to get solved before merging = my patches because changing the binding afterwards is hard? Or can they go mainline nevertheless? Thanks, Wolfram --=20 Pengutronix e.K. | Wolfram Sang | Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ | --XsQoSWH+UP9D9v3l Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAkotPdwACgkQD27XaX1/VRtCFgCdG3OTwgCSa2f7XfeouY/s4UWO glkAn1KU3AwcC2lVVuy9oFvNdXpPU8wD =pEkx -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --XsQoSWH+UP9D9v3l--