From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp1.linux-foundation.org ([140.211.169.13]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.69 #1 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1MniEL-0006xy-Cr for linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org; Wed, 16 Sep 2009 00:18:45 +0000 Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2009 17:18:26 -0700 From: Andrew Morton To: Paul Mundt Subject: Re: 2.6.32 -mm merge plans Message-Id: <20090915171826.4bd7f1d4.akpm@linux-foundation.org> In-Reply-To: <20090916000357.GD23923@linux-sh.org> References: <20090915161535.db0a6904.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <20090916000357.GD23923@linux-sh.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: kmpark@infradead.org, dwmw2@infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org, dedekind1@gmail.com List-Id: Linux MTD discussion mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Wed, 16 Sep 2009 09:03:57 +0900 Paul Mundt wrote: > On Tue, Sep 15, 2009 at 04:15:35PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote: > > mtd-make-onenand-genericc-more-generic.patch > > mtd-nand-add-page-parameter-to-all-read_page-read_page_raw-apis.patch > > mtd-nand-add-new-ecc-mode-ecc_hw_oob_first.patch > > mtd-nand-davinci-add-4-bit-ecc-support-for-large-page-nand-chips.patch > > mtd-nand-davinci-add-4-bit-ecc-support-for-large-page-nand-chips-update.patch > > mtd-jffs2-fix-read-buffer-overflow.patch > > mtd-prevent-a-read-from-eraseregions.patch > > mtd-prevent-a-read-from-regions.patch > > mtd-jedec_probe-fix-nec-upd29f064115-detection.patch > > mtdpart-memory-accessor-interface-for-mtd-layer.patch > > > > -> dwmw2 > > > Regarding mtd-make-onenand-genericc-more-generic.patch, I'm not really > sure what happened. To recap: > > It was posted to the mtd list here: > > http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-mtd/2009-August/026805.html > > Kyungmin objected to the driver name change here: > > http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-mtd/2009-August/026807.html > > I pointed out that the rough rationale for the name change here: > > http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-mtd/2009-August/026808.html > > and offered to redo the patch keeping the old name if Kyungmin felt the > rationale wasn't valid, but received no reply. Subsequently, Artem > mentioned that he had merged it in to his l2-mtd-2.6.git tree here: > > http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-mtd/2009-August/026866.html > > which subsequently seems to not actually have happened. > > This is a pretty trivial patch, and I don't mind respinning it in > whatever form folks are content with. I had assumed given the mention > that it had been merged in to the l2 tree that the rationale was > sufficient for merging. I don't think that Artem's tree is in linux-next, so I have no visibility of what's happening with that patch. I do think that Artem's tree should be in linux-next. I guess I'll just hose the patch at dwmw2 and will see what happens. I sent it on Aug 6, with no effect.