From: Wolfgang Denk <wd@denx.de>
To: "Darwin Rambo" <drambo@broadcom.com>
Cc: "linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org" <linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org>,
Lauren Del Giudice <lauren@wyplay.com>
Subject: Re: UBI - exclude bootloader blocks from wear levelling
Date: Wed, 23 Dec 2009 22:40:01 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20091223214001.815CD3F6EF@gemini.denx.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <B125D8217ABC4B43826503DE00A2D44910DFC17927@SJEXCHCCR01.corp.ad.broadcom.com>
Dear "Darwin Rambo",
please do not top-post / full qoute. See
http://www.netmeister.org/news/learn2quote.html
In message <B125D8217ABC4B43826503DE00A2D44910DFC17927@SJEXCHCCR01.corp.ad.broadcom.com> you wrote:
> I think Lauren must have been referring to a bootloader that lives
> outside the kernel and file system context. For example, a small,
> standalone bootloader downloaded from a serial port to it's own
> partition, would not be known to the kernel, as it is used to launch
> the kernel or later stage bootloaders. In this case it runs
> standalone and can't sit on UBI or be launched by a linux app. If
Of course it can, assuming it is UBI-aware by itself. For example,
U-Boot is such a boot loader that can load the U-Boot image itself
from a UBI partition in NAND.
> this small bootloader was only a block or two in size, and since it
> is typically burned once for production and then becomes read-only
> for each bootup after that, wear levelling is not required or
> possible.
Noite that "read-only" is not sufficient. NAND flash will develop
errors even if you just read it often enough. See for example this
Micron Application Note:
http://download.micron.com/pdf/technotes/nand/tn2917.pdf
> Flash data retention periods are usually specified in years, and
I am not talking about "data retention" here. See section "NAND Flash
is Not a Hard Drive" in the above Application Note to understand what
I mean.
Best regards,
Wolfgang Denk
--
DENX Software Engineering GmbH, MD: Wolfgang Denk & Detlev Zundel
HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany
Phone: (+49)-8142-66989-10 Fax: (+49)-8142-66989-80 Email: wd@denx.de
Defaults are wonderful, just like fire.
- Larry Wall in <1996Mar6.004121.27890@netlabs.com>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-12-23 21:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-12-21 16:46 UBI - exclude bootloader blocks from wear levelling Lauren Del Giudice
2009-12-21 21:30 ` Darwin Rambo
2009-12-21 22:51 ` twebb
2009-12-21 23:12 ` Darwin Rambo
2010-01-09 23:18 ` Artem Bityutskiy
2009-12-22 8:08 ` Lauren Del Giudice
2009-12-22 14:03 ` Darwin Rambo
2009-12-23 6:32 ` Wolfgang Denk
2009-12-23 17:12 ` Darwin Rambo
2009-12-23 21:08 ` Lauren Del Giudice
2009-12-23 21:40 ` Wolfgang Denk [this message]
2009-12-23 23:39 ` Darwin Rambo
2010-01-09 23:14 ` Artem Bityutskiy
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20091223214001.815CD3F6EF@gemini.denx.de \
--to=wd@denx.de \
--cc=drambo@broadcom.com \
--cc=lauren@wyplay.com \
--cc=linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox