From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lazybastard.de ([212.112.238.170] helo=longford.logfs.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.69 #1 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1NTGem-0005Ps-LE for linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org; Fri, 08 Jan 2010 15:21:49 +0000 Date: Fri, 8 Jan 2010 16:21:22 +0100 From: =?utf-8?B?SsO2cm4=?= Engel To: Maxim Levitsky Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/9] MTD: create lockless versions of {get, put}_mtd_device Message-ID: <20100108152119.GB31872@logfs.org> References: <1262963092.12577.14.camel@maxim-laptop> <1262963198.12577.16.camel@maxim-laptop> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <1262963198.12577.16.camel@maxim-laptop> Cc: linux-mtd , linux-kernel , Alex Dubov List-Id: Linux MTD discussion mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Fri, 8 January 2010 17:06:38 +0200, Maxim Levitsky wrote: > > + err = __get_mtd_device(ret); Function is called here, afaics not declared and defined... > [...] > +int __get_mtd_device(struct mtd_info *mtd) ...further below. Didn't gcc complain about this? Or am I missing something? Jörn -- Luck is when opportunity meets good preparation. -- Chinese proverb