From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from cassiel.sirena.org.uk ([80.68.93.111]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.69 #1 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1NuUfo-0005Yl-5s for linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org; Wed, 24 Mar 2010 17:47:25 +0000 Date: Wed, 24 Mar 2010 17:47:14 +0000 From: Mark Brown To: Kyungmin Park Subject: Re: [PATCH] Samsung SoCs: OneNAND support Message-ID: <20100324174713.GC26910@sirena.org.uk> References: <20100324080454.GA24277@july> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20100324080454.GA24277@july> Cc: linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: Linux MTD discussion mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Wed, Mar 24, 2010 at 05:04:54PM +0900, Kyungmin Park wrote: > Samsung SoCs, s5pc6442, s5pc100, and s5pc110 has own OneNAND controller > Signed-off-by: Kyungmin Park It's probably worth pointing out that this depends on the previously posted addition of cpu_is_() for the Samsung CPUs which Ben hasn't applied - the merge at least will need to be coordinated with that.