From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.seznam.cz ([77.75.76.43]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69 #1 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1OJMTU-0005mc-HD for linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org; Tue, 01 Jun 2010 08:05:25 +0000 Date: Tue, 1 Jun 2010 12:05:19 +0200 From: Ladislav Michl To: Thorsten M?hlfelder Subject: Re: How stable is jffs2 summarize option? Message-ID: <20100601100519.GA4085@localhost.localdomain> References: <201005311503.42629.muehlfelder@enertex.de> <201006010928.17637.muehlfelder@enertex.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <201006010928.17637.muehlfelder@enertex.de> Cc: linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org Reply-To: Ladislav Michl List-Id: Linux MTD discussion mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Tue, Jun 01, 2010 at 09:28:17AM +0200, Thorsten M?hlfelder wrote: > After checking the Linux ChangeLogs at http://kernelnewbies.org/Linux26Changes > I did not find any changes related to JFFS2 summary option, so I don't think > a newer kernel is needed ;-) Above summary is meant to list user and kernel developer visible changes only. You may want to check real changelog: http://git.infradead.org/mtd-2.6.git l.